Morse v. Belfi
|
Summons
|
||||
U.S.
District Court
Eastern District of New York (Central Islip) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:10-cv-02811-JFB-WDW
|
|
||||
Santos v. Network of
al-Queda Attorneys
|
Summons
|
||||
U.S.
District Court
Eastern District of New York (Central Islip) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:12-cv-01102-JFB-WDW
|
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Bait & Switch FederalGate - the New Watergate
Friday, June 15, 2012
Why Are U.S. Companies Going Out of Business – So Rapidly?
Why U.S. Companies are going out of business is that according to an
article in the New York Post in 2011, Board of Directors and Top Executives are
taking their benefits FIRST before the company has a chance to make a profit.
Companies invest in their product and there is a cycle of growth. But
what has happened is that they are taking millions of dollars out of the
company for their extreme lifestyles and bankrupting the company itself. Then because they are in the Stock Market and
want to show they are making a profit, they lay off people from their jobs. It
is all about the fraud. It looks like companies are in the domino formation –
all going out of business - when that is just an illusion to hide the real
fraud. If Executives were satisfied with maybe a hundred thousand dollars
instead of millions, house in the islands, worldwide retreats they might
actually care about their company and what is happening in America today.
Chase Bank’s Dimon Sporting the Latest in “Obama Wear”
Chase Bank’s Dimon was sporting the latest in “Obama Wear”. Clad in
the latest chic designer suit and presidential cufflinks, he faced his hearing –
at the Senate Judiciary smiling – showing the big guys in the United States
Senate – he had the President in his pocket. Senators know, as stated in
opensecrets.org that he is the one who has contributed billions to their
campaigns. “Hey Dimon, don’t worry. This one is in the bag. Just for show, so
the U.S. can give you more money” is what the unspoken word is.
Americans Wake-up!
The Senate Judiciary is an official body and should be respected, said the
young child who believes what the media says. But child, look at their actions,
said the adult. Why is this guy who is
now in a loss of $2 Billion smiling like he just won the lottery? What he knows is that this is the latest
fraud, orchestrated by our own government. The bank will act out why we can’t
possibly bail out anyone – not even ourselves. Where did the Billion dollars
come from to buy Presidential Cufflinks? Or to contribute Billions to Senators?
Was that other peoples’ money in the bank that you used to do your bidding?
Nazi Attorneys in America Get New Flag: Al-Queda Forever!
Attorneys are
organizing everywhere to get higher wages, you might ask? No.
To destroy Civil Rights in America. Let’s face it, attorneys/lawyers are also Judges and Politicians and are everywhere these days. They include: President Obama, Mayor Bloomberg, NY State Governor Cuomo, and all Congress men and women are lawyers as well. What ever happened to farmer representation in the White House? It looks as if all their meetings have come to one congruent group staging destruction of the Constitution in full view of Americans. Does no one realize what is happening? Your rights are now going through the shredder and it will just get worse, before it gets better. Unless it is time to call our representatives that we voted into office to become accountable to us – not who is paying under the table.
To destroy Civil Rights in America. Let’s face it, attorneys/lawyers are also Judges and Politicians and are everywhere these days. They include: President Obama, Mayor Bloomberg, NY State Governor Cuomo, and all Congress men and women are lawyers as well. What ever happened to farmer representation in the White House? It looks as if all their meetings have come to one congruent group staging destruction of the Constitution in full view of Americans. Does no one realize what is happening? Your rights are now going through the shredder and it will just get worse, before it gets better. Unless it is time to call our representatives that we voted into office to become accountable to us – not who is paying under the table.
For example, the
RENAMED “Stop and Frisk laws”. The Constitution’s 4th Amendment
states against unreasonable Search and Seizure. A police officer must obtain a
warrant based on “probable cause”. If the officer does not do that, no warrant.
Mayor Bloomberg is an attorney, so he has no excuse for not knowing what he is
doing. Perhaps he has visions of being a dictator in America. He already voted
himself into a 3rd term in office, that never existed before. Mayor
Bloomberg, why don’t you tell the drug cartel in Columbia you want your own
land? If you pay enough, you might get it.
Now the Stop and
Frisk laws are a “class action” lawsuit. Looks like not only has the Federal
Court in Southern District (Manhattan) taking this stop and frisk seriously at
the ruination of the 4th Amendment, now you have to be in the “class”
to sue about it. Lawyers now can make more money at the peoples’ expense.
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Santos v Network of Al Queda Attorneys
http://mandmlegal.freehostingcloud.com/Santos_V_NETWORK_OF_ALQUEDA_ATTYS.pdfWednesday, June 13, 2012
Justia vs Law - You can't always be right
It seems the ongoing internet war of Justia versus the Law in the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys has Justia making up anything just to look right.
As you will see at the caption below, Justia has made a paper trail of the wrong events that happened in the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, 12-cv-1102, showing they are not impartial in the telling of the story.
Most people who work in the legal field know that a "caption" represents the parties of who is suing who. The Plaintiff who starts the action and the Defendant who defends against allegations. The caption itself can never be changed by anyone - not even the court system.
EXCEPT in the case of Justia (see below) in the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, the first defendant is Charles Belfi. What Plaintiffs contention was in Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, is that their money $350 was taken in E.D.N.Y. by court staff and their Summons and Complaint was stamped "official" for an index number but it was S-U-P-E-R-I-M-P-O-S-E-D on an OLD case - that old case was Morse v. Belfi 10-cv-2811 in June 2010. That case's defendant was Charles Belfi. Justia confirms that this is fraud because Justia knows about it.
HOW CAN THIS BE? Has the Federal Government resorted to Fraud - anything goes to get your money? Does the law even exist anymore if a judge is not paid behind closed doors?
Why does the U.S. Government - the Judicial Conference as well as Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts know the difference and yet do nothing?
As you will see at the caption below, Justia has made a paper trail of the wrong events that happened in the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, 12-cv-1102, showing they are not impartial in the telling of the story.
Most people who work in the legal field know that a "caption" represents the parties of who is suing who. The Plaintiff who starts the action and the Defendant who defends against allegations. The caption itself can never be changed by anyone - not even the court system.
EXCEPT in the case of Justia (see below) in the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, the first defendant is Charles Belfi. What Plaintiffs contention was in Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, is that their money $350 was taken in E.D.N.Y. by court staff and their Summons and Complaint was stamped "official" for an index number but it was S-U-P-E-R-I-M-P-O-S-E-D on an OLD case - that old case was Morse v. Belfi 10-cv-2811 in June 2010. That case's defendant was Charles Belfi. Justia confirms that this is fraud because Justia knows about it.
HOW CAN THIS BE? Has the Federal Government resorted to Fraud - anything goes to get your money? Does the law even exist anymore if a judge is not paid behind closed doors?
Why does the U.S. Government - the Judicial Conference as well as Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts know the difference and yet do nothing?
Justia
|
INCORRECT CAPTION
|
Pacer
|
CORRECT
CAPTION
|
||||||
Santos et al v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys et al
|
Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys
|
||||||||
|
Melody Morse and Moses Santos
|
Plaintiffs:
|
Moses
Santos
and Melody Morse
|
||||||
Defendants:
|
Defendants:
|
||||||||
Charles
Belfi, Belfi Investment Group, Liora M. Ben-Sorek, Richard Blumberg, Esq, Pam
Boerner, Baker Botts, William Buckley, Bob Caloy, Bryan Cave, Steve
Chajkewicz, John Ciampoli, City Mortgage, County of Nassau, District Court of
Nassau County, Find the Right Lawyer Referral Service, Forchelli, Curto,
Deegan, Schwartz, Mineo, Cohn & Terrana, Garbarini and Scher, George W.
Wright & Associates, Indian Heart Properties, Peter A. Laserna, Law
Offices of Robert Radman, Jeffrey McNabb, Nassau/Suffolk Law Services
Committee, Inc., Leigh Michele Nemetz, Dorothy O. Nese, Network Moving &
Trucking Co. Inc., Network of al-Queda Attorneys, RGOM - Resthaven Gardens of
Memory, Robert Radman, Maureen Reid, Virginia Sayer, William Goldman Scher,
Security Service Federal Credit Union, Wanda Selinger, Sheriff of Nassau
County, The State of New York, Russell Tisman, Gregg Weinstock, Noah M.
Weissman, George W. Wright and Ann Zybert
|
NETWORK OF al-QUEDA ATTORNEYS, RICHARD BLUMBERG, ESQ., RUSSELL
TISMAN, ESQ., FORCHELLI, CURTO, DEEGAN, SCHWARTZ, MINEO, COHN, & TERRANA,
WANDA SELINGER, ESQ. alias GLANSTEIN,
NASSAU/ SUFFOLK LAW SERVICES COMMITTEE, INC., PAM BOERNER, INDIAN HEART
PROPERTIES, aka COLLIN-GREENE, aka ROBIN COLIN-GREENE, ESQ., aka ROCHELLE
SIMONSON, RGOM - RESTHAVEN GARDENS OF MEMORY, F`IND THE RIGHT LAWYER REFERRAL
SERVICE, BOB CALOY aka WARREN SIMONSON aka BOB SIMONSON, CHARLES BELFI, BELFI INVESTMENT GROUP, WILLIAM GOLDMAN SCHER, ESQ. GREGG
WEINSTOCK, ESQ., WILLIAM BUCKLEY, ESQ., GARBARINI and SCHER, ROBERT
RADMAN, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT RADMAN, JEFFREY MCNABB, ESQ., LEIGH
MICHELE NEMETZ, ESQ., MAUREEN
REID, ESQ., BAKER BOTTS, SECURITY SERVICE FEDERAL CREDIT
UNION, STEVE CHAJKEWICZ, JOHN
CIAMPOLI, ESQ., COUNTY OF NASSAU, SHERIFF OF NASSAU COUNTY; PETER A LASERNA, ESQ., LIORA
M. BEN-SOREK, ESQ., GEORGE W. WRIGHT,
ESQ., GEORGE
W. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, NETWORK
MOVING & TRUCKING CO. INC.; NOAH M. WEISSMAN, ESQ., VIRGINIA
SAYER, ESQ.,
BRYAN CAVE, CITY MORTGAGE, DOROTHY O.
NESE, ESQ., ANN ZYBERT, ESQ., JUDGE SCOTT FAIRGRIEVE, DISTRICT COURT OF NASSAU COUNTY, and THE
STATE OF NEW YORK,
|
||||||||
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Bait and Switch: Federal Court in NY
Just what is the commotion with Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys in New York Federal Court? Justia has a lot to say about Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, but here is the
real scoop. Below (see page bottom) is what the Eastern District of New York wrote for the case,
Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, 12-cv-1102.
It
is embarrassing that first of all, they missed the first plaintiff in the
caption, that of Moses Santos. Only Morse is mentioned and this is not even
law. Should they go back to reading federal law and practicing federal law instead of bait and switch: the oldest fraud in history?
How
can a case end when a default judgment is entered and the Court Personnel –
including Chief Deputy Carol McMahon in Central Islip refuses to acknowledge an
official document nor refuses to enter it in the docket system as required by
law? Who is paying her to refuse to uphold the law? Al-Queda in America is the
new reality. Why is Chief Judge Carol Bagley-Amon, appointed to E.D.N.Y. in 2011 and on the Judicial Council of 2nd Cir. Court of Appeals refusing to uphold the law.
Chief Judge Carol Bagley-Amon lost the initial motion to change the judge on March 6, 2012 and would have never responded at all, unless Plaintiffs pressed the staff in Brooklyn on April 4, 2012 to find out what happened. The response would get any normal person fired for incompetence. Her staff member stated, "I didn't know I was supposed to send a response". Why does President Obama hire incompetent staff that refuse to uphold the law?
Plaintiffs
know that we do not live in Nazi Germany, even though Plaintiffs have witnessed
court personnel refusing to
do what is required by law. Why, one
must ask are court personnel refusing to uphold the Constitution and the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure? It is Treason to refuse to uphold the law.
The
mention to Informa Pauperis status shows their own stupidity by leaving a paper
trail to illegal behavior and directly to al-Queda. The fact that this case was
superimposed on Morse v. Belfi 10-cv-2811 commenced on 6/18/10, not 3/6/12 is
shown by the information in the box below.
05/25/2012
|
ORDER: Given that this
case is now closed, and because Morse has continuously contacted courthouse
staff in a threatening manner, MORSE IS DIRECTED TO STOP CALLING THE COURT
ABOUT THIS CASE. At this juncture, the Court refrains from banning Morse from
submitting written materials to the Court. Any communication to the Court must
be in writing. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C., Section 1915(a)(3)
that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, thus,
in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. Ordered by
Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 5/25/2012. c/m by chambers to pro se plaintiffs.
(Mahon, Cinthia) (Entered: 05/25/2012)
|
Federal Court in NY: Evidence of Bait & Switch!
Although $350 was
received by Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn office, (see below jpg) for the case of Santos v. Network of
al-Queda Attorneys 12-cv-1102 – it was never opened, but superimposed on the previous case of Morse v. Belfi
(10-cv-2811), as shown by the fact that the Magistrate Judge was William D.
Wall, not M.J. Boyle as was stamped on the Summons and Complaint on March 6,
2012. Morse v. Belfi was an Informa Pauperis or IFP that was approved for
non-payment by the U.S. Government on June 18, 2010. The case abruptly ended
without any law whatsoever – it was because one of defendants asked for Safe
Harbor and then claimed it was a typo. Yes, this is in fact true. See Santos v.
Network of al-Queda Attorneys for the invasion plans of Osama Bin Laden through
the Network of al-Queda Attorneys. The Court and court personnel refused to
uphold the law in the federal court – the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure –
because they are al-Queda agents working
for al-Queda in Eastern District of New York, but receiving a paycheck from
our own government.
Nassau County Attorney Pays Off Judges
Having the federal court in his back pocket is nothing new for Nassau County Attorney John Ciampoli, who appears to have his own personal law in his grasp for power for himself and the Network of al-Queda Attorneys, of which Mangano is also a member.
Ciampoli is creating a "lockdown" situation by having State Supreme Court Justice Bruno jumping to his tune. Justice is not served when Supreme Court Justice Bruno is only going to allow intervening in the latest - viability of the law - and allowing Mangano to push a one party sided vote to go through the legislature. Since when did the legal rules allow the politicians to break the law? When the judge (paid under the table with taxpayer money) is going the way of the attorneys - to authorize the breaking of the law. Are we still living in America?
Justice Bruno will not even convene until 6/27, seven days after the June 20th deadline that will AUTOMATICALLY allow Mangano to do whatever he pleases - with the Legislature having any say. Is everyone dead?
What Attorney Ciampoli doesn't want anyone to know is that he regularly pays off judges with taxpayer money - where else would millions of dollars go.? You don't always see the marionette strings, but how else can you get a judge to issue a ridiculous decision - without law? Where is the comptroller who is supposed to give an accounting of money used in Nassau County?
In the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, 12-cv-1102, in Eastern District of New York, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - the law of the Federal Court are not being upheld. This case was dismissed at the whim of Nassau County Attorney Ciampoli who failed to answer the Summons and Complaint according to Rule 12 but did not get issued a default - because he already paid off the judge. He did the same thing in the prior case of Morse v. Belfi 10-cv-2811. Instead of Judge Bianco issuing Default Judgment (that was sent 3 times to the court - but the office never processed it) to those who did not answer according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4, 12, and 8(b)(6), he dismissed the case and the law of the court and America.
In fact, Judges are regularly in the pocket of Nassau County Attorney Ciampoli. He is the head of the New York Division of Network of al-Queda Attorneys across America that want to cripple the United States and take the secret money confiscated and give it to our enemy - al-Queda. Why would an attorney - who is supposed to uphold the law not do so? Retirement plans in the country of their choice. They - trusted politicians are saying, "to hell with taxpayers, it's all about me".
Trusted politicians are not so trusted when their own actions show they have a secret agenda. That secret agenda is shown in their being a member of the Network of al-Queda Attorneys. Nassau County Executive Mangano and Nassau County Attorney Ciampoli called a hearing with only one party -Theirs and the judge's decision in their favor for them to underhandedly win. - who will oppose the breaking of the law?
Mayor Bloomberg, another attorney, wants to eradicate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution see http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment - Search and Seizure. Probable Cause and a required warrant that is required now he wants to eliminate. No longer is privacy of each citizen going to be allowed. Who elected himself again to break the law by giving himself an extra term in office? Yes, that was Mayor Bloomberg now renaming the 4th Amendment, "Stop and Frisk" laws. Mayor Bloomberg, you should know better. It is up to Americans to re-learn our own law.
Ciampoli is creating a "lockdown" situation by having State Supreme Court Justice Bruno jumping to his tune. Justice is not served when Supreme Court Justice Bruno is only going to allow intervening in the latest - viability of the law - and allowing Mangano to push a one party sided vote to go through the legislature. Since when did the legal rules allow the politicians to break the law? When the judge (paid under the table with taxpayer money) is going the way of the attorneys - to authorize the breaking of the law. Are we still living in America?
Justice Bruno will not even convene until 6/27, seven days after the June 20th deadline that will AUTOMATICALLY allow Mangano to do whatever he pleases - with the Legislature having any say. Is everyone dead?
What Attorney Ciampoli doesn't want anyone to know is that he regularly pays off judges with taxpayer money - where else would millions of dollars go.? You don't always see the marionette strings, but how else can you get a judge to issue a ridiculous decision - without law? Where is the comptroller who is supposed to give an accounting of money used in Nassau County?
In the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, 12-cv-1102, in Eastern District of New York, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - the law of the Federal Court are not being upheld. This case was dismissed at the whim of Nassau County Attorney Ciampoli who failed to answer the Summons and Complaint according to Rule 12 but did not get issued a default - because he already paid off the judge. He did the same thing in the prior case of Morse v. Belfi 10-cv-2811. Instead of Judge Bianco issuing Default Judgment (that was sent 3 times to the court - but the office never processed it) to those who did not answer according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4, 12, and 8(b)(6), he dismissed the case and the law of the court and America.
In fact, Judges are regularly in the pocket of Nassau County Attorney Ciampoli. He is the head of the New York Division of Network of al-Queda Attorneys across America that want to cripple the United States and take the secret money confiscated and give it to our enemy - al-Queda. Why would an attorney - who is supposed to uphold the law not do so? Retirement plans in the country of their choice. They - trusted politicians are saying, "to hell with taxpayers, it's all about me".
Trusted politicians are not so trusted when their own actions show they have a secret agenda. That secret agenda is shown in their being a member of the Network of al-Queda Attorneys. Nassau County Executive Mangano and Nassau County Attorney Ciampoli called a hearing with only one party -Theirs and the judge's decision in their favor for them to underhandedly win. - who will oppose the breaking of the law?
Mayor Bloomberg, another attorney, wants to eradicate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution see http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment - Search and Seizure. Probable Cause and a required warrant that is required now he wants to eliminate. No longer is privacy of each citizen going to be allowed. Who elected himself again to break the law by giving himself an extra term in office? Yes, that was Mayor Bloomberg now renaming the 4th Amendment, "Stop and Frisk" laws. Mayor Bloomberg, you should know better. It is up to Americans to re-learn our own law.
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Nassau County Attorney Ciampoli Works with al-Queda
Nassau County Attorney John Ciampoli is doing business with al-Queda's attorneys in the New York area that like Nassau county Attorney Ciampoli make money from al-Queda in America.
As an attorney, Mr. Ciampoli would have full knowledge that his wrongdoing is illegal and wrong. However, Nassau County Attorney John Ciampoli compounds his illegal activity by using taxpayer money to rid himself of his own enemies. See Exhibit U, Page 264 of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys 12-cv-1102.
As an attorney, Mr. Ciampoli would have full knowledge that his wrongdoing is illegal and wrong. However, Nassau County Attorney John Ciampoli compounds his illegal activity by using taxpayer money to rid himself of his own enemies. See Exhibit U, Page 264 of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys 12-cv-1102.
Friday, June 8, 2012
Suspicions Abound As Number Of Red-Light Cameras On L.I. Is Set To Double
June 7, 2012 8:11 PM
Add CBS Local to read, share and discuss today's news.
What's this?
Red-Light Cameras On Long Island (Credit: CBS 2)
Filed under
LI News, Lifestyle, Local, News, NY News, Radio.com - Sports, Seen On CBS 2HD, Syndicated Local, Syndication, Watch + Listen
Related tags
ACS, ATS, Charles Lavine, Jennifer McLogan, Nassau County, Nassau County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency, Patrick Gallagher, red light cameras, Samuel Levine, Setauket, Suffolk County, Suffolk County's District Attorney Staff, U.S. Justice Department
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) - There is currently a warning out to drivers: The number of red-light cameras on Long Island is about to double.
But some are wondering if the cameras are there to reduce accidents or to make money for the counties and companies that install them.
Red-light cameras have been around for two decades, but they suddenly are proliferating. On Long Island, legislators are quietly approving doubling the amount. Both Suffolk and Nassau Counties plan to have 100 intersections each with lights, cameras and controversy.
“I am suggesting for the first time that the United States Justice Department investigate these two major corporations,” former Nassau County District Judge Samuel Levine told CBS 2′s Jennifer McLogan.
The two major corporations that Levine is referring to are the Arizona-based ATS and the Virginia-based ACS. Both are private companies that administer the red-light cameras on Long Island and rake in millions of dollars.
“With their operations, their contracts, their methods and procedures, they’re in it for the money,” Levine said, “and to jeopardize our civil rights and rights to fair hearings.”
The vendors receive a share of the fines collected based on the number of citations paid each month.
“I think it’s rather odd when the government gets into business with a private enterprise,” Patrick Gallagher of Setauket said, “and splits the profit while preying on the driving public.”
Gallagher has taken a stopwatch to yellow lights to prove that they are non-uniform, ranging from 3.6 to 5.4 seconds. He claims that overzealous cameras are snapping away, nabbing drivers at the busiest intersections as opposed to the most dangerous ones.
The business is a lucrative one. A red-light camera ticket is $50, the surcharge is $15 and a late fee is $25, not to mention that offenders have to pay another $4 if the ticket is paid online or over the phone. One ticket could almost double to $94.
But State Assemblyman Charles Lavine is of the opinion that these cameras save lives.
“Most of these companies are reputable,” Lavine said. “But that doesn’t mean that the public has to let its guard down. The public has to remain vigilant, especially any time we’re talking about a lot of money. And we are talking about a tremendous amount of money here.”
Both private red-light camera companies– ATS and ACS — said that their goal is to increase public safety honestly and effectively.
The final determination on the ticket is made not by the red-light camera companies, but by the Nassau County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency and the Suffolk County’s District Attorney Staff.
What is your take on the addition of red-light cameras? Do you think that these private companies are simply out for more money, or is the initiative in the interest of public safety? Sound off with your thoughts and comments in the section below…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)