Translate

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Federal Court in NY: Evidence of Bait & Switch!


Although $350 was received by Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn office, (see below jpg)   for the case of Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys 12-cv-1102 – it was never opened, but superimposed on the previous case of Morse v. Belfi (10-cv-2811), as shown by the fact that the Magistrate Judge was William D. Wall, not M.J. Boyle as was stamped on the Summons and Complaint on March 6, 2012. Morse v. Belfi was an Informa Pauperis or IFP that was approved for non-payment by the U.S. Government on June 18, 2010. The case abruptly ended without any law whatsoever – it was because one of defendants asked for Safe Harbor and then claimed it was a typo. Yes, this is in fact true. See Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys for the invasion plans of Osama Bin Laden through the Network of al-Queda Attorneys. The Court and court personnel refused to uphold the law in the federal court – the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure – because they are al-Queda agents working for al-Queda in Eastern District of New York, but receiving a paycheck from our own government.

No comments:

Post a Comment