Bait and Switch: Federal Court in NY

Just what is the commotion with Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys in New York Federal Court? Justia has a lot to say about Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, but here is the real scoop. Below (see page bottom) is what the Eastern District of New York wrote for the case, Santos v. Network of al-Queda Attorneys, 12-cv-1102.

            It is embarrassing that first of all, they missed the first plaintiff in the caption, that of Moses Santos. Only Morse is mentioned and this is not even law. Should they go back to reading federal law and practicing federal law instead of bait and switch: the oldest fraud in history?

            How can a case end when a default judgment is entered and the Court Personnel – including Chief Deputy Carol McMahon in Central Islip refuses to acknowledge an official document nor refuses to enter it in the docket system as required by law? Who is paying her to refuse to uphold the law? Al-Queda in America is the new reality. Why is Chief Judge Carol Bagley-Amon, appointed to E.D.N.Y. in 2011 and on the Judicial Council of 2nd Cir. Court of Appeals refusing to uphold the law.

         Chief Judge Carol Bagley-Amon lost the initial motion to change the judge on March 6, 2012 and would have never responded at all, unless Plaintiffs pressed the staff in Brooklyn on April 4, 2012 to find out what happened. The response would get any normal person fired for incompetence. Her staff member stated, "I didn't know I was supposed to send a response". Why does President Obama hire incompetent staff that refuse to uphold the law?

            Plaintiffs know that we do not live in Nazi Germany, even though Plaintiffs have witnessed court personnel refusing to do what is required by law.  Why, one must ask are court personnel refusing to uphold the Constitution and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure? It is Treason to refuse to uphold the law.

            The mention to Informa Pauperis status shows their own stupidity by leaving a paper trail to illegal behavior and directly to al-Queda. The fact that this case was superimposed on Morse v. Belfi 10-cv-2811 commenced on 6/18/10, not 3/6/12 is shown by the information in the box below.

05/25/2012

20

ORDER: Given that this case is now closed, and because Morse has continuously contacted courthouse staff in a threatening manner, MORSE IS DIRECTED TO STOP CALLING THE COURT ABOUT THIS CASE. At this juncture, the Court refrains from banning Morse from submitting written materials to the Court. Any communication to the Court must be in writing. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C., Section 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, thus, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 5/25/2012. c/m by chambers to pro se plaintiffs. (Mahon, Cinthia) (Entered: 05/25/2012)